Logroño, (EFE) and “his body does not appear because the only one who knows where it is is the defendant.”
This lieutenant of the Judicial Police has testified in the second session of the trial with a people’s court that is held in the Provincial Court of La Rioja against Óscar PR, as the alleged perpetrator of the murder of Javier Ovejas in Entrena in July 2021, whose body has not appeared.
This investigator has reported that the victim, who was 31 years old and had been living in Entrena for a few months, was “a rookie criminal at the level of drug trafficking”; while the defendant was very well known and feared in the town due to his dense record with the National Police and the Civil Guard”.
He added that the “trigger” of the murder was the “daring” of Ovejas to steal some collector’s coins from the defendant, who is 46 years old.
According to the report, on July 29, 2021, the defendant summoned Ovejas to his house to pay him a debt in order to set him up “a trap”, because he did not enter the home and took him “with a trick” to the ramp area to “kill” him.
Afterwards, he has indicated, he got rid of the corpse and the incriminating effects, such as firearms, something that has been verified by the “evidence” that appeared in the patio of the house, which the Civil Guard considers “the main scene” of the crime.
Signs and evidence
The hypothesis of the Benemérita is based on direct evidence, such as the study of the defendant’s telephone behavior, which found two moments of no use: between 9:28 p.m. and 9:54 p.m. to “kill sheep” and at 9:54 p.m. to 22:04 to move the body and get rid of other effects.
Regarding the scientific evidence, he has cited four sheep blood samples on the floor of the ramp, on the driver’s door and inside the back of the van that he used to move the corpse and also in an inflator device.
This lieutenant has added that the testimonies of the three neighbors – who heard screams and shots that night and saw the van leave Óscar PR’s house – are consistent with these facts and with the appearance of four 22-caliber shells in the defendant’s yard.
The defendant had an alibi “to evade the action of justice”, he explained, which was his night trip to Logroño with an acquaintance to try to fix his car.
rational planning
However, in “this rational planning”, he did not have two drawbacks: that Ovejas arrived at his house after taking the dog out in his car and left it parked in front of the house; and the attitude of his girlfriend, who accused him of his disappearance, has been specified.
In Ovejas’ car, which did not block the exit from the garage of his alleged murderer, the Civil Guard found a backpack with old coins.
With the track of the start that took 10 minutes, the Civil Guard reconstructed the possible route and found remains of the Ovejas mobile phone, “intentionally destroyed”.
For his part, after testifying at Navarrete’s post on August 30, the defendant changed his smart mobile phone card to an analog one, in which only his calls from previous days could be verified.
This lieutenant has highlighted the “effort” carried out throughout a year by the Civil Guard to search for Sheep based on their movement during that night, with raids by Citizen Security agents, the Rapid Action Group (GAR), tracking dogs of corpses, a helicopter, Specialist Groups in Underwater Activities (GEAS) that searched in wells and a georadar team, with which they reviewed the defendant’s properties.