Madrid (EFE) has produced a reduction in sentences for independentistas, as according to the popular ones the Government intended.
“Please use the constitutionalist votes to restore the right of sedition”, Feijóo demanded this Tuesday from the Prime Minister, Pedro Sánchez, in statements to journalists after attending an informative breakfast by the president of the Xunta de Galicia, Alfonso Rueda .
Feijóo has stressed that in the review of the sentence of the procés, which maintains the 13-year disqualification of the ERC leader, Oriol Junqueras, the Supreme Court accredits that Spain “has given up protecting its democracy” with the “annihilation” of the crime of sedition.
“This legal ridicule has already set all the records, after only yes is yes, after the elimination of the crime of sedition, after the attempt to reduce penalties for embezzlement from those of the procés, at this time in Spain a a minimum of calm and a minimum of respect for our democracy”, he stressed.
And he has offered the votes of the PP to replace the crime of sedition in the Penal Code because it supposes a “guarantee of the integrity of the Spanish nation.”
The leader of the PP has left journalists’ questions about abortion unanswered, after criticism from conservative sectors and the Church for the support of the popular for the law of deadlines, declared constitutional in its entirety, and that the PP clarifies that it does not consider that abortion is a right
Forcadell (ERC) believes that judges are “punishing” the Government
For her part, the former president of the Catalan Parliament, Carme Forcadell, has assured about the sentence of the “procés” of the Supreme Court that the judges are “punishing” the Government of Pedro Sánchez and are interpreting the reform of the Penal Code “against the will of the legislator ”.
Speaking to La 2 and Ràdio 4, Forcadell admitted on Tuesday the bittersweet taste of this position, since despite being “good news” for her, she cannot enjoy it when thinking about her colleagues.
“It is not a matter of the reform having failed, but rather a matter of the interpretation that the judges make. They are interpreting against the will of the legislator. What justice is doing is correcting the Government. Tell him: I don’t like this reform and therefore I will interpret it the way I know you don’t want. If not, it doesn’t make sense ”, he stated.
Thanks for sharing. I read many of your blog posts, cool, your blog is very good.