Santa Cruz de Tenerife (EFE) from 2012 to 2019.
Specifically, the documentation and annexes submitted to the Prosecutor’s Office refer to incentivized redundancies that, according to the study carried out, “could be classified as false disciplinary dismissals and unfair administration”, which entailed the payment of 1,579,945 euros in compensation , the Tenerife Council reported this Friday.
In addition, it adds that some workers came to receive “compensation greater than their annual salary, therefore exceeding the compensation for objective dismissal” through the conciliation procedure and without there being a judicial resolution that forced it.
From the moment the Cabildo de Tenerife became aware of this procedure, it has informed the management bodies of the Casino companies of all the steps that have been taken to clarify the facts, the island corporation said in a statement.
As detailed in the report, in the letters sent to each of the affected workers, the dismissals were classified as “disciplinary dismissals”, which led the workers to appeal the decision of the companies, going to the Arbitration Mediation Service. and Conciliation (SEMAC).
At SEMAC, the companies recognized the unfairness of the dismissal and offered compensation to the workers that, in certain cases, exceeded that corresponding to an objective dismissal.
The report highlights the fact that this “modus operandi” is repeated by several dozen workers who were laid off between 2012 and 2019, many of them close to retirement age who in no case resorted to the courts to obtain their compensation.
The president of the Cabildo, Pedro Martín, points out that already in the last audits carried out in the years 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018, the Intervention area detected various irregularities in the dependent entities that affected the hiring of personnel, contracts with third parties and economic and financial management.
To counteract this situation, the Cabildo de Tenerife affirms that it has promoted during this mandate the elaboration of instructions and specific internal procedures to guarantee that the different public entities comply with basic norms such as the Public Contracts Law (CSP), the statute Basic of the Public Employee and the General law of subsidies. EFE
Thanks for ones marvelous posting! І ceгtainly enjoyed
reading it, yoou ϲould Ƅe a greɑt author.I wkll
remember tо bookmark your blog ɑnd definitely will
come back νery soon. I want tⲟ encourage continue your gгeat writing, һave a nice afternoon!
Ꭺlso visit my homepage – Real Estate Expert Canada